Impact of New Retirement Age Proposal – Why It’s Not Good News for Many Americans!

By: Eliot Pierce

Sharing is caring!

As the new Administration settles in, Republicans are seizing the opportunity to push their ideas about Social Security and its funding challenges. Missouri Republican Congressman Mark Alford recently took to Fox News to discuss a controversial proposal – raising the retirement age. Alford, along with other Republican figures, believes that adjusting the retirement age could help address the federal government’s financial issues.

During an appearance on Fox, Alford spoke about a recent meeting with Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, who will lead the unofficial Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) under a potential Donald Trump administration starting in January.

Alford stated, “I think there’s a way, when people are living longer, they’re retiring later, then on the front end, we can move that retirement age back a little bit.” The idea is to tackle the “$36 trillion” national debt and its unsustainable interest payments by cutting federal spending, particularly from social programs.

Controversy Over Raising the Retirement Age: The full retirement age (FRA) is currently set at 67 for those born in 1960 or later, a significant increase from 65. While some argue that raising the FRA could be a solution to Social Security’s funding issues, critics believe it may not be a popular move.

According to Stephen Kates, a principal financial analyst for RetireGuide.com, raising the age at which people can claim benefits “is a backward way of simplifying reducing benefits.” Kate adds, “The earliest age someone can claim benefits is 62, and doing so typically results in a 30% decrease to their monthly benefits compared to their expected benefits at full retirement age (67).” If the retirement age increases, benefits would start later, meaning they would be smaller for future retirees.

See also  Worked for 15 Years? See What Social Security Has for You?

Lisa Whitley, a financial coach and planner at MoneyByLisa, shares a similar viewpoint, arguing that “I do not believe there is a constituency among the public for raising the retirement age. Most people already claim benefits early, receiving a ‘discounted’ benefit. Raising the FRA will only widen the wealth gap between lower and higher-income households. The expectation of a longer life expectancy is not necessarily synonymous with working longer.”

Potential Alternatives to Raising the Retirement Age: While some favor raising the retirement age, others suggest there are better alternatives to shore up Social Security’s funding. One such alternative is to increase or eliminate the salary cap subject to FICA taxes, which would require taxing the wealthy. However, given this would affect the affluent, it’s a measure unlikely to be supported by a Republican administration.

The unclear proposal for a new full retirement age could set it as high as 70. Rachel Greszler, a senior research fellow at the Roe Institute, proposed this in an article for the Heritage Foundation as a way to address the funding gap. Her suggestion aligns with the March 2024 Republican Study Committee budget, which also advocates for setting the new retirement age at 70.

This proposal to raise the full retirement age does find some Republican support. Georgia Representative Richard McCormick implied there would be necessary cuts. “We’re going to have some hard decisions,” he said. “We have got to bring the Democrats in to talk about Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare. There are hundreds of billions of dollars to be saved, and we know how to do it. We just have to have the courage to take on these challenges.”

See also  Official IRS announcement to all taxpayers – New deductions announced for 2025

The debate over raising the retirement age is far from settled, with many opinions across the political spectrum. While some believe it could help solve financial woes, others think it would simply delay retirement benefits for many Americans. The outcome of this discussion will likely influence future Social Security policies for years to come.

Source


Every piece of content is rigorously reviewed by our team of experienced writers and editors to ensure its accuracy. Our writers use credible sources and adhere to strict fact-checking protocols to verify all claims and data before publication. If an error is identified, we promptly correct it and strive for transparency in all updates.

Leave a Comment