San Francisco supervisors vote to reverse RV parking restrictions

By: Eliot Pierce

Sharing is caring!

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted 7-3 to overturn an SFMTA decision that prohibited recreational vehicles from parking overnight on public streets on Wednesday, following hours of public debate.

SFMTA’s initial plan, which would have let authorities to tow RVs and other large vehicles parked on roadways marked at the agency’s discretion, was met with vociferous criticism from advocates for the homeless like Joy D’ovidio.

“Everyone has gone through the trauma of having their car towed. At the board meeting, D’Ovidio remarked, “Imagine having your house towed.” “We must be more compassionate than that.”

Additionally, the initiative mandated that the city provide RV owners with shelter prior to towing their vehicles. According to Lukas Illa, a human rights organizer with the Coalition on Homelessness, the prohibition is not practical because there is not enough accommodation available in the city.

“There is no proactive outreach to RV residents,” Illa stated. RV-specific infrastructure does not exist. People who live in cars don’t have any ways to solve problems.”

On the other hand, several supervisors believed that the ban was an essential first step in resolving the city’s persistent homelessness issue. Three elected officials opposed the reversal, including Supervisor Rafael Mandleman.

“I believe that we have to have our public spaces be usable for everyone,” Mandleman remarked. And I believe that we will never accomplish that goal if we wait to do so until we have a place to live for all of the homeless people who might end up in San Francisco. Additionally, that will be a major issue for our city.

See also  East Bay shoppers support local stores on Small Business Saturday

About 458 individuals were living in RVs as of October of this year, when the SFMTA voted in favor of Mayor London Breed’s proposed ban, according to the city’s street response dashboard. Supervisor Dean Preston expressed his optimism that the reversal will provide a chance to reconsider San Francisco’s approach to homelessness.

“There should be a more comprehensive plan of how to address the fact that so many people, especially families, are forced to live in RVs because they can’t afford apartments in San Francisco,” Preston stated. “But in the meantime, I really object to this effort to really scale up the enforcement crackdowns and towing.”

Note: Every piece of content is rigorously reviewed by our team of experienced writers and editors to ensure its accuracy. Our writers use credible sources and adhere to strict fact-checking protocols to verify all claims and data before publication. If an error is identified, we promptly correct it and strive for transparency in all updates, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!

Leave a Comment