These local sheriffs are already planning to assist Trump carry out his mass deportation plan

By: Chiefs focus

Sharing is caring!

Conservative sheriffs are a crucial ally of Donald Trump’s vow to begin the biggest deportation operation in US history as soon as he assumes office.

About 6,000 federal immigration agents work for the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) department, but the new administration is depending on empathetic local police enforcement to act as its eyes and ears in jails and communities across the country.

Sheriffs are typically elected by the people and have a lot of authority, including managing the county jails. In contrast, police chiefs are appointed by the governor.

A large number of conservative sheriffs who share the new administration’s political stance are keen to cooperate.

I am prepared to fully support the president, Chuck Jenkins, the Republican sheriff of Frederick County, Maryland, recently told The Wall Street Journal. While abiding by the law, I wish to do more.

“We are going to be in the business again,” he told the newspaper. The sheriff of Ohio’s Butler County is Richard Jones.

Trump is also expected to have the support of the dissident constitutional sheriff movement.

Local, mostly right-wing sheriffs who believe they are the only ones who can determine what is lawful and constitutional in their jurisdictions—despite state or federal legislation or Supreme Court rulings to the contrary—are the driving force behind this movement.

These sheriffs violated COVID regulations during the height of the outbreak and have been vocal in their support of Trump’s allegations that the election was rigged.

In a recent post on Truth Social, the soon-to-be president discussed his relationship with and support for sheriffs.

See also  America’s biggest private firm is laying off thousands of employees.

Trump has attempted to align himself with conservative local sheriffs who enforce immigration laws during his electoral ascent. Joe Arpaio, the well-known but now-retired sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, is one such.

In a civil rights complaint filed in 2017, Trump exonerated Arpaio of stopping and detaining Latino constituents he believed might be violating immigration rules, even though they weren’t. Arpaio was found guilty of contempt of court for failing to abide by a 2011 court order to cease these stops.

Although the federal government is typically in charge of enforcing immigration rules, governors of states who support Trump have also taken on this task.

Texas claims that in order to fulfill its ambitious new ambitions, immigrants are physically flooding the state. It has invested billions in Operation Lone Star, which has constructed walls and other obstacles along the Mexican border and increased the number of state troops stationed there.

This election season, Proposition 314 was approved in Arizona. It granted state police and courts the authority to remove persons and made illegal immigration a state offense in addition to a federal one.

Under both the Republican and Democratic administrations, local sheriffs have collaborated with federal immigration officers on initiatives such as the 287(g) system.

As part of 287(g) agreements, they serve ICE warrants, provide information with federal authorities, and in certain situations, initiate the deportation process directly. Sheriffs verify prisoners’ immigration status.

Because these agreements allow police to target people they believe to be illegal immigrants based on their skin color or language, some organizations, such as the American Civil Liberties Union, claim that they give police authorization to abuse.

See also  Shocking News: Parents Arrested After 4-Year-Old Boy Dies from Starvation in Harlem Apartment!

The group examined the more than 140 local law enforcement agencies participating in the program as of 2022 and discovered that 59% of the sheriffs had a history of racial profiling and other civil rights violations, such as the excessive use of force, and at least 65% of the sheriffs had a history of racist and anti-immigrant rhetoric.

One such location was Frederick County, where a Latina woman prevailed in a lawsuit alleging that she was stopped by deputies for having a broken tail light when none existed and that they had asked her about her immigration status.

Some claim that the public is less safe when local police collaborate with immigration officials because immigrants and members of minority groups are frightened to approach police or other government institutions for fear of deportation.

“The last thing we want is for people who are a part of our economy, our school system, our community, and the fabric of our city to feel like they have to hide out of sight,” Boston Mayor Michelle Wu told WCVB this month.

A regulation that prohibits municipal police from using their resources to enforce immigration laws for minor infractions has been in place in the city since 2014. On immigration matters involving criminal allegations like drug or people trafficking, however, they can cooperate.

Many towns and communities around the nation are regarded as sanctuary cities and do not cooperate with federal immigration officers, including Boston.

Rumor has it that as part of its strategy to crack down on sanctuary states and localities, the Trump administration may stop providing federal funding to them.

See also  Boy, 9, Dies After Attack by Father at Seven Months Old, Left Him Brain-Damaged and Blind

Tom Homan, Trump’s border czar, threatened to imprison Denver’s mayor for claiming that local law enforcement could prevent federal officers from deporting migrants.

The mayor then retracted his remarks on the police, but he still urged local residents to oppose the proposal to deport many people.

Despite the political narrative that Democrats have neglected immigration more than Trump, a Reuters investigation reveals that the Obama administration deported more immigrants than Trump in nearly every year of its two years.

More people were deported by the Biden administration in 2023 than in any other year of Trump’s first term.

Note: Every piece of content is rigorously reviewed by our team of experienced writers and editors to ensure its accuracy. Our writers use credible sources and adhere to strict fact-checking protocols to verify all claims and data before publication. If an error is identified, we promptly correct it and strive for transparency in all updates, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!

Leave a Comment